Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Defending Christianity -- Or Maybe Not

    One of my favorite conservative media blogs recently criticized a liberal media blog that asked “Could we please just get God out of religion?” http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2015/05/24/daily-beast-asks-can-we-please-get-god-out-religion.  
     In My opinion,  both Tim Graham, writing for the conservatives and Barrett Homes Pitner, writing for the liberals, missed the point. 
    I wonder  “Could we please get politics out of religion, put God back into the church and stop idolizing overly emotional, unrealistic, sentimental ideas about who Christ was and what he did?”
     Liberal agendas of political correctness, multi-cultural inclusiveness, gay rights, climate change and environmentalism dominate Twenty first century church discussions.  Pope Francis, who purports to be the leader and spokesman for 1.2 billion Catholics across the globe, regularly opines on popular western topics and has recently jumped onto the anti-capitalist, environmentalist and gay rights bandwagons.  He stops short of endorsing gay marriage while he maintains the traditional Catholic stance against ordination of women and marriage of priests.  
     Why are liberals attacking religion when churches are promoting the gospel of liberalism? 
      It seems to me that liberals and contemporary Christians want the same things.  They expect God, the church and the government to be gushing nannies that will grant all wishes, accommodate everybody’s whims, guarantee a comfortable carefree life and release us all from responsibility or consequences for anything. 

    A local theatre production of “The Christians” by Lucas Hnath sparked my zeal for this topic and stirred me to write this blog.
    The play focuses on worship at a successful contemporary mega-church.  The senior pastor preaches about a revelation he has that hell may not be a literal place and folks living an otherwise moral existence may not be condemned to eternal damnation just because they haven’t been baptized or publicly proclaimed their belief in Christ.  This disclosure upsets the associate pastor who begins reading and quoting every scripture passage he can find that talks about hell.  Members of the congregation are asked to choose sides.  A schism ensues and this huge mega-church fades to ruin.  The end!  And the end of the church-- at least that’s what liberals and atheists hope for.
   In my conservative, -- perhaps naïve – opinion, I see this as an opportunity for true thinking and discernment. 
    What do we believe?
  Why do we believe what we believe? Where did these ideas come from?
   How do our beliefs inform and affect our everyday lives?

   Are we willing and able to seek common ground where we can all live, work, and worship together though we may disagree on some of the finer points of scripture, politics and social preferences? 
   Note the wording “seek common ground” not “compromise?”  There’s a huge difference. 
     Compromise means lowering standards, giving up and giving in.  “Seeking common ground,” means lifting awareness to a higher perspective and objectively examining all sides of the issues. It requires thinking.   
    I don’t mean intellectual acumen.  Most pastors are intellectually, astute, unless they received their clerical certification from one of those internet sites where the only credentialing requirement is completion of the forms and paying the fees. 
     I am referring to being able to go beyond the intellect, to raise awareness to a higher level where inspiration resides, to be able to use that inspiration or “spirit” for pure understanding and then to discipline and integrate intellect, emotions and physical activity to achieve the ideas and goals generated from that kind of understanding.  That’s what the real Christ taught and exemplified. 
     The only intelligent way to understand The Christ and the scriptures about his life and teaching is to reflect on the historical context and symbolic meanings as well as the words of scriptural text.   This kind of approach requires thinking – using the mind instead of the emotions. 
      But just as some folks mindlessly believe everything that comes from favorite politicians and media gurus, many contemporary Christians fall into lockstep with their churches’ preaching and teaching.  No thinking is required or desired.  Salvation comes from “accepting Christ into one’s heart,” being baptized, publicly proclaiming devotion to Jesus and memorizing salient scripture passages to be recited on demand while trusting what the church and the clergy say without question.   Bonus grace is awarded for throwing in “Jesus Loves You”, “God Bless” and “I’ll pray for you” as car bumper stickers and punctuation for all communications, much as mindless sports fans punctuate their communications with the aphorisms of their favorite teams.  After all, sports fanaticism truly is a sacred religion throughout the world. Total combined weekly worship attendance at a thousand of the most popular churches doesn’t come close to the number of folks congregating in sports stadiums and around television screens to scream, jump up and down and let their emotions rage while watching favorite athletic contests.
   “Can I get an Amen? ….  Praise God!.... Go Team!...  Alleluia!....  Thank Ya Jeeesusss!”

    The truth is that if the real Jesus returned to earth today and started living, working, preaching and teaching in the same way he did over 2,000 years ago, he would again be maligned by the liberal left that felt threatened by the kind of real power, love and understanding that Jesus commanded.  Jesus’ message and example would again be misunderstood and disregarded by the weak-willed who felt an emotional attachment to Jesus and meant to follow him but could not get past their fears, doubts, superstitions, worries and wanting things to be easy.  Jesus would again be handed over for execution by some right-winged radical who was dissatisfied that Jesus didn’t use his power to do away with all the liberals.  And the mindless mobs would deny Jesus and cheer for his execution again rather than risk the wrath of all the activists, union leaders and chief government officials. 
    It saddens me to be so cynical about religion. I have many fond memories of attending worship and being part of church communities.   Church was an oasis for me in grim confused moments of childhood.  Fellowship with church folks formed the core of my social life for over 50 years, including my three years on active duty with the army.  Church sustained me in times of loneliness, loss and fear. I sang in church choirs for most of my adult life. I have experienced many powerful, rich, spirit-filled religious rituals and ceremonies. 
    But people wanting to hold hands during The Lord’s prayer or shouting Alleluia and Amen in the midst of worship, embarrasses me. I prefer adherence to the scripture passage that says,  When you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.  (Matthew 6:6).
    Too many church people seek personal prestige and support for a political church instead of making sincere attempts to build up humankind for God’s kingdom.  It’s what some people have come to label “churchianity”.
    I am tired of hearing clergy preach and teach didactic liberal dogma.  I am annoyed by attempts of petty politicians to dominate church activities and exercise their personal egos by spreading gossip and disrupting congregational meetings with their negativity and their desires to control others.  
      On Christmas Eve in 2011 our pastor used his sermon to draw analogies between Jesus’ birth in a manger and the “Occupy Wall Street” movement that was trending at the time. 
   My regular worship attendance waned after that. Church friendships have faded.

    Though I have stopped going to church, I still consider myself a Christian.  I believe in the things that Jesus taught and the example he gave. 
   I have lost faith in organized religion.  It has ceased to support and nurture my conservative principles, values and ideas. 
    

No comments:

Post a Comment